Subscribe to our alternative health newsletter!

Flax Redeemed Vis-a-vis Prostate Cancer: Health Blog

| | Comments (5)

flax

Back in 2002, a series of studies started coming out challenging the safety of flax seed oil for men in regard to prostate cancer. In October of that year, I wrote a newsletter questioning the validity of those studies, and I caught a lot of grief for taking that position. People questioned my judgement saying, "Why even go there?" "Better safe than sorry." "Why not just use fish oil to get your Omega-3’s?" Even many alternative health authorities backed away from flax based on those studies.

My position then (as it has remained for the last five years) was that the studies made no sense. They ran counter to all logic and anecdotal experience. And more to the point, there were things in flax seed oil (lignans) that actually prevented prostate cancer and that were not found in fish oil.

Well, the results of a new study of flax seed, sponsored by the National Institutes for Health, were just announced at a meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. In summary the study found:

  • Flaxseed supplementation significantly reduced cancer cell proliferation rates in men with prostate cancer.
  • Flaxseed is one of the richest known sources of lignans, which affect androgen metabolism and have antimitotic, antiangiogenic, antioxidant, and estrogenic effects.
  • Median proliferation rate (MIB-1 volume) was 1.5 in patients randomized to flaxseed and low-fat diet, 1.66 in the flaxseed-only group, 2.56 in the low fat-diet group, and 3.23 in the control group (P=0.0013). The proliferation rate did not differ between patients randomized to flaxseed alone or in combination with a low-fat diet.

So, is the purpose of this blog entry to gloat and say, “I told you so?” Not at all. In fact, the point of this blog entry isn't even really about flaxseed at all.

The point is that as study after study comes out slamming natural health alternatives claiming that they are ineffective or even dangerous, take them with a grain of salt. If they run contrary to logic, contrary to decades of anecdotal evidence, then they probably aren't worth the time it takes to read them. And more to the point, it might not be just a question of better safe than sorry. You might very well indeed be losing a valuable health component by "cautiously" abstaining. Think of all the cancer protection men just lost who stopped using flaxseed over the last five years by "playing it safe."



Comments

Posted By: Jayson | June 4, 2007 12:33 PM

I think the mudslinging between fish and flax proponents will do more harm than good. Unfortunately, the press coverage of this study has been inaccurate and a bit cynical.

What was used in the study? Was it flax seed or oil?

Flax oil is different from fish oil - it induces mania in some bipolar patients but fish oil can actually diminish it.
That has nothing to do with prostate cancer, it's just a warning that flax may not be the best choice for everyone.

Posted By: Jon Barron | June 4, 2007 5:49 PM

I absolutely appreciate the comments about mudslinging, but this entry is not about comparing fish oil to flaxseed oil. In fact, as I state above, it’s not even really about Omega-3 oils at all. The flaxseed study was just a launching point to talk about overreacting to negative studies.

Incidentally, when it comes to comparing flaxseed oil to fish oil, don’t forget krill oil. Each offers something the other does not have. (Check out the second link in the entry which takes you to a blog that compares the three.) In the end, it’s not about using one or the other, but rather, using a combination to get the benefits of all three.

Posted By: Doug Hulstedt | June 13, 2007 3:26 PM

Hi Jon,
What are you recommending to pregnant women and breastfeeding women for their omega-3s.
I have switched over to Udo oil with DHA from fish oil for the last few months. Doesn't fish oil have potential for depleting the fish populations? and krill knocking out the base of the food pyramid in the ocean? ie don't whales need to eat too?
Also isn't veggie based oil less fragile than fish oil? Am I losing braincells in infants as I am a pediatrician making recommendations. Plus our family owns a health store. Thanks

Posted By: Jon Barron | June 21, 2007 4:46 AM

Yes, there are problems with the potential depletion of fish and kill in the ocean. Unfortunately, for many people, Omega-3 vegetable oils are not an option because their bodies have lost the ability to convert alpha-linolenic acid into DHA and EPA. Check out http://www.jonbarron.org/newsletters/02/10-21-2002.php.



Post a Comment

Name:
Email Address:
URL:
Remember Personal Info?
Comments: (You may use HTML tags for style)
 
 
Contact Us | About Us | Legal Disclaimer | Content Share Program | Press Room | Site Map