Alternative Cancer Therapies & Cell Phones | Natural Health Blog
Subscribe to BlogCell Phones Pop Corn, Toast Brains

A recent study out of the Harvard School of Public Health found a strong link between air pollution and deep vein thrombosis (DVT)--a dangerous type of blood clot that forms in the thighs or legs and can travel to the lungs. After comparing health records of 870 people diagnosed with DVT in Lombardy, Italy, to the records of 1210 people who did not develop clots, the research team discovered a dramatic rise in risk factor at pollution levels far below the EPA's standard for particulate air pollution. The lowest level of pollution recorded in the study was 12 micrograms per cubic meter of air; the EPA standard is 150 mcg per cubic meter. The researchers found that for every 10-microgram increase in pollution above the 12-mcg level, risk goes up by 70 percent.
Study director Dr. Andrea Baccarelli, said "It is well-established that air pollution causes myocardial infarction [heart attack] and stroke. This is the first time that anyone has connected air pollution with deep vein thrombosis."
The dangerous particulate matter causing the problems is usually a blend of microscopic particles from sources such as vehicle emissions, particularly diesel, the burning of industrial fossil fuels, as well as from woodstove fires, dust storms, and natural fires. The effects of inhaling air pollute with particulate matter are much like the effects of breathing second-hand smoke. Because the particles are so small, they can lodge in lungs and internal organs and travel in the bloodstream like oxygen. Scientists already knew that pollution spikes the incidence of lung problems ranging from asthma complications to lung cancer. And studies have found that exposure to pollution from car fumes triples the risk of heart attack in heart-attack survivors. The EPA says that 65,000 Americans suffer pollution-related cardiac problems each year.
Those estimates seem quite conservative in the face of a new study released by the California Air Resources Board, which found that 24,000 deaths annually in California result from chronic exposure to pollution. Chief researcher Bart Croes said, "Our report concludes these particles are 70% more dangerous than previously thought, based on several major studies that have occurred in the last five years." According to the LA Tiimes, "....rates of heart attacks, strokes and other serious disease increase exponentially after exposure to even slightly higher amounts of metal or dust." And other sources, notably Dr Robert D Brook of the University of Michigan, say that air pollution ranks number 13 among the world's killers.
Now, we can add DVT to the list of pollution-related bugaboos -- and that's no trifle, as the condition is fatal in one-third of the cases left untreated. If you're worried, note that the pollution-DVT link is stronger for men than for women and virtually nonexistent for women on hormone therapy or the pill (and no, I'm not recommending that you get on HRT or the pill).
So what can you do to minimize damage from pollution, short of moving to Tasmania? Well, you can stop taking pollution, smog, and haze as a given. This means monitoring pollution levels where you are. Several websites offer up-to-the-minute air-quality info, and you can even have daily updates emailed to you reporting pollution levels in your area from a service called EnviroFlash.
On smoggy days, it's risky to exercise outdoors, and in general, you should opt to exercise away from highways, factories, and fires. Stay away from burning trash. If your county has no-burn laws, make sure your neighbors comply. If you don't have laws limiting the burning of trash, get active and contact your legislators. Unfortunately, the same goes for fireplaces-- romantic though they are. An EPA study found that breathing emissions from burning wood fires on polluted days is equivalent to smoking four to 16 cigarettes.
You can find suggestions for 50 ways to minimize both your exposure to air pollution and your contribution to it here. You'll notice, though, that most of the ideas involve taking action that won't necessarily protect you in the moment. For instance, advocating the abolition of diesel-operated busses may eventually pay off, but it won't protect you today, and you need buy-in from others before this measure takes hold.
That's why it really pays to do those things that you do have control over:
- Complete your heavy metal detoxing regularly since heavy metal concentrations are high in most air pollution.
- Use a daily full spectrum antioxidant supplement to mitigate much of the damage.
- Supplement with a good proteolytic enzyme formula to help control DVT.
- Cleanse your blood and internal systems.
- Clean the air in your house using a good filter or ion system.
- Check the radon levels in your house -- easy and not expensive.
- And maybe consider that move to Tasmania, after all. Or if you don't want to live down under, you can check this list of the places that have the world's cleanest air.
:hc
Related Articles: Alternative Cancer, Cancer
Share or Bookmark...
Exclusive Health Reports
Did You Know?
Not all fats are bad? That some vitamins could actually harm you? Find out in our free bi-weekly newsletters!







Comments
Hey Everyone:
I have to admit, it's great fun reading all the comments on my blog, but let's get real for a moment. There's nothing ambiguous about the blog. The reference to the popcorn videos was merely to use them as an attention grabber and as a launching point for a discussion on cellphones. Out of 11 paragraphs, only one and a fraction reference the popcorn videos. If anyone thinks the blog is about popcorn, they're obsessing.
The major argument against cellphones being a health risk is that no one can explain how they might be causing problems. But as researchers who have raised concerns point out, just because science can’t explain the mechanism doesn’t mean one doesn’t exist. (For that matter, can anyone of you say for sure what causes cancer? I don't think so. But I also don't think any of you doubt that people get cancer.) In any case, in recent studies on cellphones that suggest a risk, the tumors tend to occur on the same side of the head where the patient typically holds the phone. True, the studies are observational, showing only an association between cellphone use and cancer, not a causal relationship. Nevertheless, some of the research suggests a link between cellphone use and three types of tumors: glioma; cancer of the parotid, a salivary gland near the ear; and acoustic neuroma, a tumor that essentially occurs where the ear meets the brain. True, these cancers are rare so far, so even if there is a risk, it may be low. Then again, last year, The American Journal of Epidemiology published data from Israel finding a 58 percent higher risk of parotid gland tumors among heavy cellphone users. Also last year, a Swedish analysis of 16 studies in the journal Occupational and Environmental Medicine showed a doubling of risk for acoustic neuroma and glioma after 10 years of heavy cellphone use.
That may not be enough of a link to convince many of you, but it seems to be enough for a number of neurosurgeons to go public with their concerns -- and to state that they will no longer hold their cellphones to their heads. Finally, for those of you who are interested, you might want to look at Dr. Vini Khurana's report on the issue. Dr. Khurana is an associate professor of neurosurgery at the Australian National University. http://www.brain-surgery.us/mobph.pdf. Observing from the POV of the neurosurgeon who is seeing these brain tumors first hand, he is more than a little concerned.
Hi Barry:
Nope, you can't cook an egg with a cellphone anymore than you can pop popcorn. The same principles apply. However, just because the videos are hoaxes and you can't cook with cellphones, does not mean that cellphones are harmless. As I pointed out above, although the exact mechanism through which cellphones harm the brain may be unknown, the statistical evidence that they do so is starting to become overwhelming. Just because we don't know how it harms brain tissue (it doesn't cook it) doesn't mean it doesn't harm it.The egg video, though, like the popcorn video, is a great attention grabber. Thanks for sharing it.
Post new comment